Abstract
The purpose of this research is to improve learning
outcomes of administrationoffice education student faculty of economy Surabaya
State University through the implementation of project-based learning model learning
on business presentation theme. It is a class act research consisting of two
cycles. The subject is students of administrative offices education 2nd
semester of academic year 2014/2015. Data is gained from lecturer and students
through research instruments for affective aspect, non-test of observation for
psychomotor aspects, and through written test instrument for cognitive aspect.
Affective aspect is observed from the attitude with 4 assessment aspects using
scale of range assessment of 4. Psychomotor aspect is observed through product
assessment with 7 assessment aspects using scale of range assessment of 5.
Cognitive aspect is observed by written test instrument. The result showed that
the implementation of project-based learning model learning improve learning
outcomes of students, the percentage of students who complete increase from 50%
in the first cycle to 87.5% in the second cycle. Affective aspect indicates
achievement increase from 40.62% in the first cycle to 93.75%in the second
cycle. As for the psychomotor aspect, increase from 28.13% in the first cycle
to 100% in the second cycle.
Keyword
(s): Project Based Learning, Learning Outcomes, Business Presentation
I PRELIMINARY
Education
is essentially an effort to provide the knowledge, insight, skills and specific
expertise to individuals to develop their talents and personalities, because it
has got the attention of education should be constantly in an effort to
increase quality. Education is essentially an effort to provide the knowledge,
insight, skills and specific expertise to individuals to develop their talents
and personalities, because it has got the attention of education should be
constantly in an effort to increase quality. Santyasa in Parma (2005 )
improving the quality of education also means improving the quality of human
resources. According Winataputra in Parma (2005) national education goals is to improve the quality
of education in every type and level of education.
Based
on the observations of researchers in education courses that the administrative
offices, the results of study on subjects of public relations, in particular
the presentation materials business in 2012 semester student of the academic
year 2014-2015 can be categorized economics faculty of Surabaya in low learning
outcomes. This is indicated by the value of pre-test at the beginning of the
delivery of the material by researchers, the results are very low. This is due
to lack of interest and attention of students to the subject matter, of course
this will greatly affect student learning outcomes. To increase the interest
and attention of the students and also simultaneously improve learning outcomes
on student presentation materials business office administration education 2nd
half 2012 economic faculty of Surabaya in force, need to be designed so that
students' learning model can improve understanding of the concept, so that the
problems encountered can be overcome.
With
the relevant research beforehand, so that the researchers got the reference of
the study conducted by prasada (2014) conducted a research project based
learning, entitled Implementation of Model-Based Learning Projec in Subjects
Assembling PC To Improve Student Results Class X TKJ2 Public Vocational School
3 Singaraja. Where mastery learning completeness percentage increase of 28.58%
with an average value of 66.31 in the first cycle, an average value of 79.10
with 85.71% completeness in the second cycle. So of reference of the
researchers got the idea and tend to choose to use alternative the same, namely
the application of the model Project Based Learning, because of the application
of this model has many benefits that can be achieved, for example: (1) students
to be learners active, (2) learning becoming more interactive or
multidirectional, (3) be a student-centered learning, etc. Due to project-based
learning can provide learning outcomes in the form of knowledge (knowledge),
skills (or psychomotor skills) and attitude (attitude or affective), the
assessment is carried out for the third realm. Forms of assessment can be
either a test or nontes. Project Based Learning is a model or innovative
learning approach, which emphasizes learning through activities that complex
contextual (Cord, 2001; Thomas, Mergendoller, and Michaelson, 1999) in Trianto
(2014: 42). According to Gagne (in Khoerul, 2013) of learning outcomes is an
internal capability (capability) which includes knowledge, skills and attitudes
that have become private property and allow someone to do something. There are
three learning outcomes that should be achieved through this learning process,
namely cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. According Munadi (Siswoyo, 2013)
where the assessment of learning outcomes, of course, influenced by internal
factors and external factors that can alter the student. Where internal factors
can be divided into two, namely (1) the general Fisiologis.Secara factor
physiological conditions, such as good health, not in a state of exhausted and
tired, not in a state of physical disability and so on. This can affect
learners to receive course materials, (2) Psychological Factors. Each indivudu
in this case the students basically have psychological conditions vary, of
course this also influence the learning results. Several psychological factors
include intelligence (IQ), attention, interests, talents, motives, motivation,
cognitive and reasoning power participants didik.Dan external factors can also
be divided into two, namely (1) Environmental Factors. Environmental factors
can affect learning outcomes. Environmental factors include the physical
environment and natural sosial. Environment eg temperature, humidity and other.
Study at midday in the room will be less air circulation would be devastating
and would be very different in the morning learning conditions are still fresh
and with enough space to breathe. (2) Instrumental Factor. Factors instrumental
factor is the existence and use is designed in accordance with the expected
learning outcomes. These factors are expected to serve as a means for the
achievement of learning objectives that are planned. This instrumental factors
such as curriculum, facilities and teachers.
The
material in the 2nd half of college public relations for education student administration
office is a business presentation with a few sub materials namely; (1) The form
for business presentations. (2) Matters to be considered in making a business
presentation script. (3) The process of writing the script business
presentations. (4) The importance of business presentations for public
relations. (5) The basic technique business presentations. Through the
implementation of project-based learning models researchers try to help
afflictions lecturer in delivering learning materials to students. Based on the
above problems, the authors tried to raise this topic into a research titled:
“Application of Project Based Learning Model to Improve Student Learning
Outcomes On Business Presentation Theme".
II LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Methods Research Project Based
Learning
According
to Thomas cited by Made Wena (2012: 144) "Learning Project Based Learning
is a learning model that provides the opportunity for teachers to manage
classroom learning with work involving the project". Project work includes
complex tasks that require students to design, solve problems, make decisions,
investigate, and provide an opportunity for students to work independently.
Sane
Kamdi (2008: 7) states "learning projects can be prepared in collaboration
with the trainer single or double instructor, while students learn in
collaborative groups between 4-5 people". When students work in teams,
recording find the skills to plan, organize, negotiate and build consensus on
issues of task to be done, who is responsible for each task, and how the
information will be collected and presented.
Based
on these descriptions can be concluded that the method of project-based
learning can improve student motivation in other words students are more
diligent and strive to complete the project given by the lecturer.
B. Learning Outcomes
Implementation
of learning is learning outcomes. Here's proposed definition of learning
outcomes according to experts:
1. Nana
Sudjana (2009: 3) student learning outcomes is essentially a change in behavior
as a result of learning in a broader sense include the areas of cognitive,
affective, and psychomotor.
2.
Dimyati and Mudjiono (2006: 3-4) learning outcomes is the result of an
interaction acts and acts of teaching and learning. In terms of teachers, teaching
acts ends with the evaluation of learning outcomes. In terms of students,
learning outcomes is the end of the teaching of the peak of the learning
process.
3.
Forijad (1989) defines the learning outcomes is a mental process that leads to
the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and attitudes with process skills and
implemented in order to create a progressive and adaptive behavior.
4. Udin
S. Winataputra (2007: 110) study results are proof of the success that has been
achieved by students in which every learning activity can lead to a change in
the typical. In this case study include process skills, liveliness, motivation
also learning achievement. Achievement is a person's ability to complete an
activity.
From
the above opinion can be concluded that the result is the ability to learn the
skills, attitudes and skills acquired student after he received treatment given
by the lecturers so that they can construct knowledge in everyday life.
C. Business Presentation
In general, a business presentation has
four main objectives (Djoko Purwanto, 2006) which can be described below:
1)
Inform messages to the Audience Business
One of the goals of the most common
business presentation is to convey or inform (inform) business messages to the
audience (audience).
2)
Entertain Audience
In addition to providing information,
business presentation also aims to entertain (entertain) audience. That is, to
achieve the goal of business presentations of the speakers need to tuck fresh
humor that is able to turn the atmosphere.
3)
Touching Emotion Audience
In addition to giving information clan
entertaining, business presentations also have a goal to be able to touch the
emotions (emotion) audience. With the diction and intonation sounds
interesting, a speaker able to arouse the emotions of the audience.
4) Motivate Audience to Action
Provide motivation (motivation) to the
audience to do something or act as desired pembicara.Dalam motivate the
audience, a speaker needs to express it explicitly clan not use the language of
preamble.
Thus, it can be concluded that the
purpose of business presentations, among others:
a) informs the business message.
b) Convincing the audience.
c) Persuading the audience.
d) Inspire others.
e) Entertaining the audience.
f) As a means of education for the
audience who study the technical presentation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results
of study subjects public relations business presentation materials at pre-test
initial observations of 33 students is obtained by calculating the average of
this classical there are 2 of the test and non test, for affective and
psychomotor aspects of using research instruments in the form of non-test in
the form of observation. Observation of attitude as much as 4 aspects of
assessment using a range of assessment scales 4 to affective, psychomotor to
use observation as much as 7 aspects of the product assessment using a range of
assessment with 5 assessment scale and to use the instrument in the form of
cognitive tests, in the form of written tests.
Table
1. Table Conversion Reference Benchmark Assessment Scale 5 (five) level
learning outcomes
Percentage
|
Level
of Learning Outcomes
|
90-100
|
Very
High
|
80-89
|
High
|
65-79
|
Medium
|
55-64
|
Low
|
0-54
|
Very
Low
|
Implementation
of the action on the first cycle through the implementation of project-based
learning model of the data obtained is generally not fully reach the expected
target. It can be seen from the data classical completeness affective amounted
to 40.62% if converted to the benchmark reference Assessment scale five in
Table 1 can be categorized as very low with an average of 77.73, next to the
psychomotor completeness classical amounted to 28.13% yield is considered very
low when considered in the table 1 assessment benchmark reference scale of five
with an average of 73.75 and the cognitive domains in the first cycle
completeness classical by 50%, the average value of classical amounted to 68.84
and absorption of classical amounted to 68.84% by students who completed as
many as 16 people out of 32 students, the results of the cognitive above if
converted to Reference Benchmark Assessment scale five in Table 1 absorption
and average classical can be categorized as moderate, while the completeness classical
still at the very low category as well with classical completeness total for
the third domain of the first cycle is at 39.58%. Based on the results obtained
in the first cycle, then corrective measures need to be done in the second
cycle to reach minimum completeness criteria 70 on cognitive and psychomotor
reached minimum completeness criteria 75 on the affective and classical
completeness is more than 85% for all domains as well as the target of
classical completeness total for all three domains more than 85%. In applying
the model of project-based learning, there are still obstacles to be overcome,
these constraints include (1) During the learning process learning activeness
of students already apparent, but still not optimal, (2) There are still many
students are hesitant in the presentation and provide responses or answers to
his friend, (3) The answer given student is still very simple and impressed
memorizing it, (4) There are still some students are less developed the ability
optimally to answer all the exercises, (5) When designing writing scripts
business presentations there are some groups who are less active and less
cooperation. Based on the results of the reflection of the need for a solution
as the basis for improving the implementation of the action on the second
cycle. As a solution, namely (1) To enhance the students' understanding of the
learning model is applied, the researchers first had to explain again in detail
about the technical learning by using a model of project-based learning, which
accepts all complaints of students and then provide motivation and guidance so
that students feel ready in the learning process, (2) researchers to motivate
students to bring confidence and courage in every presentation of its business
and answer exercises, (3) Researchers will invite students to present their
business ideas and answer questions directly, more develop affective abilities
of students, as well as re-emphasizing the concept of learning independent and
active, (4) Researchers will motivate when students apply the technique to make
business presentations are nice as well as the work on the problems that can
monitor student activities if experiencing difficulty, (5) Research by lecturer
teachers motivate students to be challenged to design a power point
presentation of the business and look for other learning resources in
developing capabilities in the field of public relations is. Based on the
results obtained in both the second cycle of the learning process and results
of the test, to produce a product, it can be stated already meet the desired
target researchers. This can be seen from classical completeness affective
reached 93.75%, these results when converted into the benchmark reference
Assessment scale five in Table 1. can be categorized as very high with an
average of 92.57, followed by classical completeness on psychomotor achieve
100% results if converted into a benchmark reference Assessment scale five in
Table 1 can be categorized as very high with an average of 89.28, and the last
one on the cognitive mastery klasikalnya reach 87.5% this result if converted
into the benchmark reference Assessment scale five in Table 1 can be
categorized as high with an average of 75.84.
Table
2. Data of Student Learning Outcomes Department of Economic Education Program
Office Administration Education 2012 Faculty of Economics Unesa. At Cycle I and
Cycle II
LEARNING
OUTCOMES
|
CYCLE
I
|
CYCLE
II
|
||||
Mean
|
Absorption
(%)
|
KK
(%)
|
Mean
|
Absorption
(%)
|
KK
(%)
|
|
Affective
|
77.73
|
|
40.62
|
92.57
|
|
93.75
|
Cognitive
|
68.84
|
68.84
|
50
|
75.84
|
75.84
|
87.5
|
Psychomotor
|
73.75
|
|
28.13
|
89.28
|
|
100
|
Classical mastery Total
|
|
|
39.58
|
|
|
93.75
|
Judging
from the above table that a significant increase in the percentage in each
domain assessment. Where each sphere has reached the target assessment has been
determined that the achievement of individual learning completeness minimum
completeness criteria 70 for the cognitive, psychomotor minimum completeness
criteria 75 for affective and classical completeness above 85% for all domains.
In the cognitive domain absorption reached 75.84%, the average reached 87.5%
classical completeness. results of post test the cognitive domain if converted
into the benchmark reference Assessment scale five in Table 1 for absorption
and average classic can be categorized as very high and the completeness classic
can be categorized as very high as well with classical completeness total for
all domains in cycle 2 This amounted to 93.75%. This fact shows that the
results of the research have surpassed the expected target. This is caused by
(1) the application of project-based learning models can be implemented
effectively, (2) a conducive learning environment, (3) learning-oriented
students, and (4) enthusiasm and activeness of students has shown total
increase of completeness number of all the classical realm can reach above 85%.
Besides achieve improved learning outcomes, the learning process in the
classroom became more favorable after the implementation of this project-based
learning model, students become more active in supporting the learning process,
so that learning becomes more convenient.
Where
classical completeness percentage increase from the first cycle to the second
cycle in the affective domain of 16.02%, 37.5% cognitive and psychomotor
amounted to 26.25%. Things like this are integral to the theory underlying the
application of learning models project-based learning, in which the learning
process students are not expected to just listen, take notes, and then memorize
the subject matter, but the model of project-based learning every student is
forced to be more active thinking and acting, communicate, find and process the
data, and finally concluded.
Based
on the results of the action on the first cycle and the second cycle can be
said that the application of the model Project Based Learning can increase
learning outcomes of students of economics faculty office administration of
Surabaya in the course of public relations.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Artana, I Dewa Made. 2013. Application of
Cooperative Script Method To Increase Activity and Learning Achievement Hindu
Religious Education Students of Class XI IPA 2 public senior high school 2
Singaraja.
Dimyati
and Mudjiono. 2006. Teaching and Learning. Jakarta: Rineka Reserved
Faiq Mohammed. 2014. Model Project Based Learning
Curriculum Learning 2013. Available at: http:// classroom action research.blogspot.com/2014/05/
project-based learning model.html. Retrieved on 25 Desember 2014.
Forijad.
1989. Research and Evaluation Study. Jakarta: Work Together.
ikhsanudin, Eka. 2014. Learning Model Project Based
Learning. Available at: http: //www.ekaikhsanudin.net/2014/09/ project-based
learning model.html. Retrieved on 25 Desember 2014.
Khoerul, Eko. 2013. Theory of Learning Outcomes.
Available at: http://ekokhoeruln.blogspot.com/2013/02/ theories of learning
outcomes.html. Retrieved on November 7, 2014.
Koyan, I Wayan. 2011. Assessment in Education.
Singaraja: Undiksa Press. Kemdikbud.2014. Teachers books craft and Enterprise
XI. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Nugraha, Galina. 2013. Efforts to Improve Ability To
Operation Multiplication and Division Through Traditional Games Dakon In Grade
IV Public Alementary School Genengan 2 Kawedanan. available at: http:
//galihsatya.blogspot.com/2013/01/classroom action research.html. Accessed on
24 April 2015.
Parma,
I Made. 2005. Application of Learning Approach Based on Contextual Issues
Open To Improve Understanding Concepts, Activities
and Results Math Grade XI IPA public senior high school 2 Singaraja
Paizaluddin, Ermalinda. 2014. Class Action Research
Theoretical and Practical Guide. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Purwanto,
Djoko. 2006. Business Communications. Jakarta: Erland
Prasada, I Dewa Nyoman. 2014. Implementation of
Model-Based Learning Project (Project Based Learning) By Subject Assembling PC
To Improve Student Results TKJ2 Class X public vocational school 3 Singaraja
academic year 2013/2014. Essay. Department of Education Electrical Engineering,
Undiksha.
Siswoyo. 2013. Factors Affecting Results study. http:
//dedi 26.blogspot.com/2013/01/ factors-that-affect outcome.html. accessed on
November 7, 2014.
Nana Sudjana. 2009. Teaching and Learning Outcomes
Assessment. Bandung: PT Young Rosdakarya.
Trianto. 2014. Design of Innovative Learning Model,
Progressive, and Contextual. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Udin S Winataputra et al. 2007. Teaching and
Learning Theory, Jakarta: Central Publishing Open University.
Widoyoko,
Eko. 2014. Schools Learning Outcomes Assessment. Yogyakarta: Student Library
Zainal
Abidin, 2014. Evaluation of Teaching. Padang:UNP
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar